fidel4's Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends]

Below are the 9 most recent journal entries recorded in fidel4's InsaneJournal:

    Thursday, July 28th, 2011
    2:02 pm
    Race The Thugs With COP -The Pursuit
    With car games becoming an obsession for online players, gamers are searhing for racing games that define the adrenaline rush at a much higher standard. The COP-The Pursuit is a typical car rushing game with a twist. The players act as a police officer who was a former criminal in a spree just to save the New York City from the Bomb zombies.

    Instructions: Instructions of Cop - The Pursuit is a piece of cake and like just about any other car games. To get the special speed boost, utilize the space bar. Police sirens improve the boost meter of your truck. You can begin using them on the way in order to keep your vehicle boosted. The terrorists are armed, so you better be aware.

    Theme: New York is threatened by the terrorists that portent to wipe out the city. You are going to embark on a venture to overtake and ram the bomb zombies away from their commission. The players play the role of Dan Miles who's a former criminal and now, turned C.O.P. As the gamers embark on the mission to get rid of the terrorists, they are permitted to take very keen actions to have the job done. The short verbal’s of the director and Dan pops up in the panel with teasers from the rouge vehicle driver. On failing of the mission, Dan’s car explodes itself on colliding with the road blocks.

    Controls: Access the WASD keys or the arrow keys on the keyboard to manage the course of the auto. The game is absolutely devoid of mouse functions. Sound can be turned on and off relating to the comfort of the car owner.

    The car is really not difficult to deal with and responds too well to the keys. Even a novice gamer will not have a tough time running these motor vehicles. Placed in the city, the walkways are also extremely delicate and tiny that aid control.
    Monday, March 14th, 2011
    6:54 pm
    Preventing premature death
    Is it possible to extend the human life span beyond early
    twenty-first century practical limits and achieve an increase
    in the duration of healthy life among the older population?
    Answers to these questions may be found in work under way
    in molecular biology. Based on a current understanding of
    the process of senescence, extending the human life span
    would require slowing down the aging rate itself. There is no
    definitive evidence at this time to indicate that the life span
    of humans can be modified by any means. However, there is
    suggestive evidence to indicate that dietary restriction could
    postpone many of the physiological decrements associated
    with aging—including those associated with both fatal and
    nonfatal diseases of aging (Weindruch and Walford). Although
    it is not practical to expect that human experiments will be
    conducted on the longevity benefits associated with dietary
    restriction, or that enough people will actually restrict their
    diets to influence national statistics, research in this area may
    eventually reveal the underlying physiological mechanisms
    that link dietary restriction to increased longevity. In this
    way it may eventually become possible to imitate the effects
    of dietary restriction without actually altering diet.
    Scientists debate these issues on scientific grounds, but
    there are important moral issues close to the surface in the
    discussions. For example, we know that a lower life expectancy
    observed among subgroups of the population is linked
    to poverty and minority status. If we are interested in
    preventing premature death, then social conditions may be a
    more direct target than efforts to manipulate the basic rate of
    aging. Also, the definition of “premature death” is no longer
    obvious, and raises questions about the value of length of life
    compared with quality of life when extreme longevity is also
    associated with the expression of frailty and disability.
    Thursday, January 6th, 2011
    2:57 pm
    Some restrictions on abortions
    However, just as Roe v. Wade allowed for some restrictions
    on abortions after fetal viability, so the medical profession
    has shown a reluctance to perform abortions later in
    pregnancy, even early in the second trimester. In addition to
    new ethical dilemmas over fetal and maternal rights, many
    medical professionals remain ambivalent about the morality
    of abortion, a conflict that is heightened both by increased
    technological sophistication in the field of perinatology and
    genetics and the current political climate.
    Depending on the technology available to a physician
    and the condition of the individual fetus (gestational age and
    any developmental deformity), it is often possible, depending
    on the availability of neonatal intensive support, to save
    the lives of premature babies born at twenty-seven weeks
    gestation. Babies born at twenty-four to twenty-six weeks
    and earlier have survived with intensive neonatal intervention
    and support, though often with some degree of functional
    impairment. With abortions occasionally performed
    up to twenty-four weeks gestation, one can see the conflict
    within medicine: Fetuses that might be aborted by one
    group of physicians are aggressively supported as patients by
    another group.

    casino club
    Saturday, July 17th, 2010
    4:48 pm
    Principales casino en ligne à gratter Scratch2Cash.com a annoncé qu'un joueur chanceux italien a pris la maison une récompense de 50.000 € avec la permission de son rapide jeu de mains, récemment publiée.

    Le site de Malte-licence a révélé que les mains Fast est basée sur le jeu hors ligne célèbre de roche, papier, ciseaux où les joueurs doivent battre l'un l'autre offre afin de gagner.

    «Je ne pouvais pas croire que je pouvais gagner", a déclaré gagnant Mirco M '.

    «J'étais sur le point d'abandonner et puis j'ai vu sur l'écran que j'avais gagné. J'ai ouvert la discussion et j'ai demandé «Ai-je vraiment gagné € 50,000? Je vous remercie, je vous remercie et je vous remercie."

    Cabaret Club est encourageant les autres à se connecter et essayer leur main à son dernier titre, il a révélé qu'un joueur chanceux peut ramener à la maison une récompense en argent plus élevé que un million d'euros.
    Sunday, December 27th, 2009
    11:51 am
    “Green” Vegetarians
    Green political parties in Europe (i.e., those parties committed to programs that give priority to ecological sustainability) increasingly advocate a vegetarian diet or, at least, reduced meat consumption for environmental reasons. For example, the policy of the Green Party of the United Kingdom “encourage[s] a reduction in consumption of animal produce
    and promote[s] the development and use of foods. which are more healthy and humane” (Green Party, p. 15). They offer two arguments. The first is that if enough Westerners become vegetarians, worldwide food distribution will become more equitable. It is calculated that “if we all had a vegetarian diet and shared our food equally, the biosphere could support around six billion people; if 15 percent of our calories came from animal products (and again food were shared equally), the figure would come down to four billion people; if 25 percent of our calories came from animal products, then it would fall to three billion; and if 35 percent of our calories came from animal products, as in North America today, then it would fall to 2.5 billion” (Myers, discussed in Ticknell, p. 67). The second argument is that the present system of intensive farming, while cost-efficient, will prove inefficient in the long run in terms of energy and environmental costs (Porritt). Nowadays Hoodia diet pills are claimed to be the best weight loss pills. Hence, Greens argue that the “expanding livestock industry contributes to … the destruction and pollution of the planet” by being “energy intensive rather than labour intensive” and contributes to “world starvation” (Green Party, p. 15).
    Friday, December 25th, 2009
    1:34 am
    Autonomy of Actions
    In a clinical setting, it is often important to determine whether a patient’s decision regarding treatment , or the decision of a proxy in the case of an incompetent patient, is autonomous. A person who has the capacity for autonomy may, for a variety of reasons, not act autonomously on a particular occasion. Determining whether a particular action or decision is autonomous is a matter of how the three elements of the capacity for autonomy (agency, independence, and rationality) are involved in the process of deciding. The autonomy of actions is a matter of degree because independence and rationality are matters of degree, though
    agency is not. Ruth Faden and her colleagues describe the three elements of autonomy as intentionality, freedom from controlling influence, and understanding. They point out that controlling influences and understanding can be seen on two independent continua. An action can be performed within the range of full understanding to full ignorance, and within the range of completely uncontrolled to completely controlled. Bruce Miller views the autonomy of actions and decisions on four levels: (1) as free action (agency and independence);
    (2) as authenticity (the decision is consistent with what is known about the person’s values, preferences, and plans); (3) as effective deliberation (rationality); and (4) as moral reflection (deliberation about one’s values, preferences, and plans). The decision of a patient may be autonomous at one or more, but not all levels. For example, a
    patient who accepts a recommended treatment without reflecting much about the decision, acted autonomously at the level of free action, and perhaps authenticity, but not at the levels of rationality and moral reflection.
    The legal concept of competence is closely related to the
    concept of autonomy. A competent person is one who has the capacity for autonomy, and a competent decision is one that is autonomously made.
    1:33 am
    Rights, and Liberty
    The concept of rights presupposes that right-holders are
    beings who have the capacity for autonomy, who make
    choices and can use discretion to exercise a right or not. Basic
    liberties in a liberal democracy are protected by constitutional
    and other legal rights. The idea of a right has three
    elements: the right-holder (the person who has the right);
    the object of the right (the activity or thing that the rightholder
    has a right to); and the duty-bearer (the person or institution who must do what the right requires). Negative rights are rights not to be interfered with; for example, everyone has the right not to be given medical treatment without consent, and all healthcare providers must respect this right. Positive rights are rights that a person be provided with something—for example, the right of all senior citizens in the United States to Medicare payment for healthcare, a right that is binding on government agencies and healthcare providers. Recognizing the negative right to autonomy imposes on everyone the obligation not to coerce or otherwise interfere with the action of another. This protection of autonomy is not as costly to social institutions as recognizing positive rights to autonomy. If there is a positive right to X, this means that someone is under an obligation to provide X to the right-holder(s). For example, if every citizen has a fundamental positive right to the best-quality medical care, then the state must provide full access to medical care to allbcitizens.
    Friday, December 18th, 2009
    2:19 pm
    Feral Animals
    Feral animals are those introduced by humans, not native to
    landscapes, that have managed to survive on their own.
    Management of such animals is disputed animals is disputed, especially of
    mustangs and burros in the western United States. Although
    not now living in their native ecosystems, such animals may
    have been living wild for centuries. Management policy is
    typically to eliminate them, on grounds that they are not
    authentic wildlife, although the U.S. Congress has mandated
    preserving mustangs in some localities. Animal-welfare
    advocates have protested eliminating the mustangs and
    burros. Other cases involve feral hogs and goats. On San
    Clemente Island, off the coast of California, nearly thirty
    thousand goats were eliminated, about half of them shot, the
    other half captured and relocated with poor survival rates, in
    order to protect endangered species of plants, as well as to
    prevent further degradation of the island ecosystem. The
    goats had been left there by the Spanish in earlier centuries.
    The argument here is that we have a greater responsibility to
    native wildlife and plants than to feral species.
    2:16 pm
    “Hands-On” versus “Hands-Off” Management
    Although there is a growing consensus that humans have an
    urgent responsibility actively to conserve wildlife, many
    argue that the less wildlife is managed, the better. So far as
    wild animals are managed, their wildness is compromisedthe
    paradox of wildlife management. The animals become
    artifacts, more like pets. This leads to a debate between
    “hands-on management,” which favors active intervention,
    habitat enhancement, supplemental feeding, breeding, radiocollared
    monitoring, and so on, versus “hands-off management,”
    which favors as little management as possible consistent
    with animal welfare.
    From a medical point of view, there is contention
    whether veterinarians ought to treat wildlife diseases. Like all
    physicians, veterinarians seek good health. Colorado veterinarians
    treated a lungworm disease in bighorn sheep successfully.
    By contrast, when an epidemic of pinkeye ravaged the
    bighorn sheep of Yellowstone Park, authorities refused to let
    Wyoming veterinarians treat the disease. The welfare of the
    sheep, they said, required letting the disease take its course;
    disease-resistant sheep would survive and the genetic fitness
    of the herd would improve. Whether the disease is introduced
    by humans is a factor. The Chlamydia parasite
    producing pinkeye was not thought to be introduced; some
    said that the lungworm was introduced from domestic
    sheep, or at least that the sheep were weakened due to
    human disruptions, especially of their winter range. Although
    over half the Yellowstone herd perished by starvation and
    injury following partial blindness, the herd has recovered,
    although not yet to its former numbers.
Hoodia Gordonii Absolute   About InsaneJournal